From 884835ce1cd3b1ba24d6f6bb19786d04e6b8ae90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:24:50 -0400 Subject: cutpaste: Fix bug that occured in some cases involving inlines when text was pasted on a page before being cut. --- ...ed_in_this_page_--_missing_page_dependencies.mdwn | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) (limited to 'doc/bugs/Error:_no_text_was_copied_in_this_page_--_missing_page_dependencies.mdwn') diff --git a/doc/bugs/Error:_no_text_was_copied_in_this_page_--_missing_page_dependencies.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Error:_no_text_was_copied_in_this_page_--_missing_page_dependencies.mdwn index 356f9155a..4535cf35d 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/Error:_no_text_was_copied_in_this_page_--_missing_page_dependencies.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/Error:_no_text_was_copied_in_this_page_--_missing_page_dependencies.mdwn @@ -24,3 +24,23 @@ This error shows up only for *news.html*, but not in *news/2010-07-31* or for the aggregation in *index.html* or its RSS and atom files. --[[tschwinge]] + +> So the cutpaste plugin, in order to support pastes +> that come before the corresponding cut in the page, +> relies on the scan hook being called for the page +> before it is preprocessed. +> +> In the case of an inline, this doesn't happen, if +> the page in question has not changed. +> +> Really though it's not just inline, it's potentially anything +> that preprocesses content. None of those things guarantee that +> scan gets re-run on it first. +> +> I think cutpaste is going beyond the intended use of scan hooks, +> which is to gather link information, not do arbitrary data collection. +> Requiring scan be run repeatedly could be a lot more work. +> +> Using `%pagestate` to store the cut content when scanning would be +> one way to fix this bug. It would mean storing potentially big chunks +> of page content in the indexdb. --[[Joey]] -- cgit v1.2.3