From ef95c1f21d3136b8756d7915c776ca85ae4c027a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:59:44 -0400 Subject: response --- doc/todo/fancypodcast.mdwn | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/fancypodcast.mdwn b/doc/todo/fancypodcast.mdwn index 21aadf1f7..12ca43d53 100644 --- a/doc/todo/fancypodcast.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/fancypodcast.mdwn @@ -249,6 +249,10 @@ normally no reason to do that. Why does it need an url of this form here? > way at the time. If you have a better idea, I'm happy to hear it; > if not, I'll add an explanatory comment. --[[schmonz]] +>> I would be more comfortable with this if two two different forms of url +>> you need were both generated by calling urlto. It'd be fine to call +>> it more than once. --[[Joey]] + +
+ @@ -286,6 +290,12 @@ could negatively impact eg, Planet style aggregators using ikiwiki. --[[Joey]] > really prefer the old behavior (or don't want to take any chances)? > --[[schmonz]] +>> A specific example I know of is updo.debian.net, when used with +>> rss2email. Without the author name there, one cannot see who posted +>> an item. It's worth noting that planet.debian.org does the same thing +>> with its rss feed. (That's probably what I copied.) Atom feeds may +>> not have this problem, don't know. --[[Joey]] + +++ b/templates/rsspage.tmpl + xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" + @@ -309,3 +319,5 @@ Does this added tag provide any benefits? --[[Joey]] > arrived only in RSS 2.0, but that's already the version we're > claiming to be, and it's over a decade old. Seems much less risky > than the atom namespace bits. --[[schmonz]] + +>> Sounds ok then. --[[Joey]] -- cgit v1.2.3