From 6eb89492f7b98003227fddeea6bb03d0f36b5d88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: chrysn Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 16:42:32 +0200 Subject: comment on autoindex branch --- ...sient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn b/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn index b0d88ec6d..225a60141 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn @@ -31,3 +31,13 @@ Shouldn't `ikiwiki-tag-test/raw/.ikiwiki/transient/tag.mdwn` and `ikiwiki-tag-te > git repositories any more? My `autoindex-more` branch changes > the logic so it will do what you want in the `autoindex_commit => 0` > case, and amends the appropriate regression test. --[[smcv]] + +>> the autoindex-more-often branch looks good to me in general. +>> +>> i do have doubts about the 3ba2ef1a patch ("remove unnecessary special case +>> for transient underlay"): now that we consider the complete transient +>> directory as well, the sequence in which the refresh hooks are called starts +>> to matter, and pages created by other plugins in a similar fashion as by +>> autoindex will only be included the next time refresh gets called. +>> +>> --[[chrysn]] -- cgit v1.2.3