aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorhttp://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/ <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/@web>2008-08-07 17:12:25 -0400
committerJoey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2008-08-07 17:12:25 -0400
commitbcd715266256128ae669283c48823732a03b5abc (patch)
tree7c78479c5e69832303c076a92cc763736d3809f3 /doc
parentc98ea6a971438fa465f6c0092a77c6d2fc6fda1c (diff)
downloadikiwiki-bcd715266256128ae669283c48823732a03b5abc.tar
ikiwiki-bcd715266256128ae669283c48823732a03b5abc.tar.gz
Response
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/plugins/discussion.mdwn6
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/discussion.mdwn
index 4196c5963..854307a98 100644
--- a/doc/plugins/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/plugins/discussion.mdwn
@@ -28,3 +28,9 @@ Any objections to listing plugins alphabetically rather than by creation date?
> Well, it's been done by Josh, but I do wonder if there wasn't value to
> being able to look at the top of the page for new plugins? --[[Joey]]
+
+>> I agree, which is why I brought it up here rather than just changing it.
+>> On balance I think the alphabetical list is better. You could have a
+>> "recently changed" list with the 10 most recently changed plugins
+>> at the top. That would allow what you suggested, but still allow
+>> the main list to be alphabetical. -- [[Will]]