diff options
author | Jogo <Jogo@web> | 2009-10-12 16:44:12 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> | 2009-10-12 16:44:12 -0400 |
commit | 7272938a116b2c87f8c34057034b5f4e9244cdf8 (patch) | |
tree | 37e2ff708803cc971f8d256c64dc70c00ac64bcb /doc/plugins/lockedit | |
parent | 6993d1f905c35bbad415d3f60cde924da32e80a4 (diff) | |
download | ikiwiki-7272938a116b2c87f8c34057034b5f4e9244cdf8.tar ikiwiki-7272938a116b2c87f8c34057034b5f4e9244cdf8.tar.gz |
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/plugins/lockedit')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/plugins/lockedit/discussion.mdwn | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/lockedit/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/lockedit/discussion.mdwn index 8a08edaad..867fc6a51 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/lockedit/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/lockedit/discussion.mdwn @@ -6,3 +6,13 @@ calls needsignin ]. > page is that you are not logged in. And without the jump to logging the > user in, there is no way for the user to log in, without navigating away > from the page they were trying to edit. --[[Joey]] + +>> Ok, but the problem is that when you don't want any signin form you end up +>> with a lone login button. That might happend if you lock pages only on IP +>> adresses, if you use another cookie from another webapp... + +>> That happends to me and I had to reimplement lockedit in my private auth +>> plugin. + +>> Perhaps you could return undef on that case and let another plugin do the +>> needsignin call ? -- [[Jogo]] |