diff options
author | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2008-06-24 17:25:17 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2008-06-24 17:25:17 -0400 |
commit | c509834f011c082d39d5e3afa2f0f2c8d210f98e (patch) | |
tree | a2e9eb9bb6317aed4eda9ac8e5e20e2e466e46cf | |
parent | 4a9567595a1e7daae0810986187391824db3f14a (diff) | |
download | ikiwiki-c509834f011c082d39d5e3afa2f0f2c8d210f98e.tar ikiwiki-c509834f011c082d39d5e3afa2f0f2c8d210f98e.tar.gz |
response, analysis of validation problem
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/require_CAPTCHA_to_edit.mdwn | 22 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/require_CAPTCHA_to_edit.mdwn b/doc/todo/require_CAPTCHA_to_edit.mdwn index d87c73260..64f0a38d8 100644 --- a/doc/todo/require_CAPTCHA_to_edit.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/require_CAPTCHA_to_edit.mdwn @@ -14,6 +14,15 @@ I imagine a plugin that modifies the login screen to use <http://recaptcha.net/> >> Something like the moinmoin global <http://master.moinmo.in/BadContent> >> list? +>>> OpenID can be thought of as pushing the problem of determining if +>>> someone is a human or a spambot back from the openid consumer to the +>>> openid provider. So, providers that make it possible for spambots to +>>> use their openids, or that are even set up explicitly for use in +>>> spamming, would be the ones to block. Or, providers that are known to +>>> use very good screening for humans would be the ones to allow. +>>> (Openid delegation makes it a bit harder than just looking at the +>>> openid url though.) --[[Joey]] + Okie - I have a first pass of this. There are still some issues. Currently the code verifies the CAPTCHA. If you get it right then you're fine. @@ -44,6 +53,19 @@ ignored. validate => '/.*/'); } +>> What seems to be happing here is that the openid plugin defines a +>> validate hook for openid_url that calls validate(). validate() in turn +>> redirects the user to the openid server for validation, and exits. If +>> the openid plugins' validate hook is called before your recaptcha +>> validator, your code never gets a chance to run. I don't know how to +>> control the other that FormBuilder validates fields, but the only fix I +>> can see is to somehow influence that order. +>> +>> Hmm, maybe you need to move your own validation code out of the validate +>> hook. Instead, just validate the captcha in the formbuilder_setup hook. +>> The problem with this approach is that if validation fails, you can't +>> just flag it as invalid and let formbuilder handle that. Instead, you'd +>> have to hack something in to redisplay the captcha by hand. --[[Joey]] Instructions ===== |