diff options
author | http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/ <http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/@web> | 2010-03-26 13:20:33 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@finch.kitenet.net> | 2010-03-26 13:20:33 +0000 |
commit | d88af43011193bb0eef79b749ae9a93eda5d266e (patch) | |
tree | 873fe528255656f47953bd67c15546d26fa83f53 | |
parent | 087085899f7049434ac19761f27826cec9e458d5 (diff) | |
download | ikiwiki-d88af43011193bb0eef79b749ae9a93eda5d266e.tar ikiwiki-d88af43011193bb0eef79b749ae9a93eda5d266e.tar.gz |
brief review of field; fieldsort plugin
-rw-r--r-- | doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn | 62 |
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fc1759fab --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +Having tried out `field`, some comments (from [[smcv]]): + +The general concept looks great. + +The `pagetemplate` hook seems quite namespace-polluting: on a site containing +a list of books, I'd like to have an `author` field, but that would collide +with IkiWiki's use of `<TMPL_VAR AUTHOR>` for the author of the *page* +(i.e. me). Perhaps it'd be better if the pagetemplate hook was only active for +`<TMPL_VAR FIELD_AUTHOR>` or something? (For those who want the current +behaviour, an auxiliary plugin would be easy.) + +From a coding style point of view, the `$CamelCase` variable names aren't +IkiWiki style, and the `match_foo` functions look as though they could benefit +from being thin wrappers around a common `&IkiWiki::Plugin::field::match` +function (see `meta` for a similar approach). + +I think the documentation would probably be clearer in a less manpage-like +and more ikiwiki-like style? + +If one of my branches from [[todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods]] is +accepted, a `field()` cmp type would mean that [[plugins/contrib/report]] can +stop reimplementing sorting. Here's the implementation I'm using, with +your "sortspec" concept (a sort-hook would be very similar): if merged, +I think it should just be part of `field` rather than a separate plugin. + + # Copyright © 2010 Simon McVittie, released under GNU LGPL >= 2.1 + package IkiWiki::Plugin::fieldsort; + use warnings; + use strict; + use IkiWiki 3.00; + use IkiWiki::Plugin::field; + + sub import { + hook(type => "getsetup", id => "fieldsort", call => \&getsetup); + } + + sub getsetup () { + return + plugin => { + safe => 1, + rebuild => undef, + }, + } + + package IkiWiki::PageSpec; + + sub check_cmp_field { + if (!length $_[0]) { + error("sort=field requires a parameter"); + } + } + + sub cmp_field { + my $left = IkiWiki::Plugin::field::field_get_value($_[2], $_[0]); + my $right = IkiWiki::Plugin::field::field_get_value($_[2], $_[1]); + + $left = "" unless defined $left; + $right = "" unless defined $right; + return $left cmp $right; + } + + 1; |