From a357849f5b1314c2a35efeee237645b9b08c39f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ludovic=20Court=C3=A8s?= Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:34:48 +0200 Subject: guix package: Do not misdiagnose upgrades when there are propagated inputs. Fixes . Reported by Andy Tai . * guix/profiles.scm (list=?, manifest-entry=?): New procedures. * guix/scripts/package.scm (transaction-upgrade-entry): In the '=' case, use 'manifest-entry=?' to determine whether it's an upgrade. * tests/packages.scm ("transaction-upgrade-entry, zero upgrades, propagated inputs"): New test. --- tests/packages.scm | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) (limited to 'tests') diff --git a/tests/packages.scm b/tests/packages.scm index d0befbe45d..7a8b5e4a2d 100644 --- a/tests/packages.scm +++ b/tests/packages.scm @@ -122,6 +122,28 @@ (manifest-transaction))))) (manifest-transaction-null? tx))) +(test-assert "transaction-upgrade-entry, zero upgrades, propagated inputs" + ;; Properly detect equivalent packages even when they have propagated + ;; inputs. See . + (let* ((dep (dummy-package "dep" (version "2"))) + (old (dummy-package "foo" (version "1") + (propagated-inputs `(("dep" ,dep))))) + (drv (package-derivation %store old)) + (tx (mock ((gnu packages) find-best-packages-by-name + (const (list old))) + (transaction-upgrade-entry + %store + (manifest-entry + (inherit (package->manifest-entry old)) + (item (derivation->output-path drv)) + (dependencies + (list (manifest-entry + (inherit (package->manifest-entry dep)) + (item (derivation->output-path + (package-derivation %store dep))))))) + (manifest-transaction))))) + (manifest-transaction-null? tx))) + (test-assert "transaction-upgrade-entry, one upgrade" (let* ((old (dummy-package "foo" (version "1"))) (new (dummy-package "foo" (version "2"))) -- cgit v1.2.3