diff options
author | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2013-06-04 10:29:57 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2013-06-04 10:29:57 +0200 |
commit | 9bf3c1a77d2e0fcf8d6eeafa5f3018038129fe02 (patch) | |
tree | 1d4236e60ff3429f63a4fb85d9924ce4eb52e29b /HACKING | |
parent | ae3b6bb0f4dc1f69ecb629c9b7ad34588d646039 (diff) | |
download | patches-9bf3c1a77d2e0fcf8d6eeafa5f3018038129fe02.tar patches-9bf3c1a77d2e0fcf8d6eeafa5f3018038129fe02.tar.gz |
doc: Write about patch submission and packaging guidelines.
* HACKING: Update the command names from `guix-build' to `guix build' & co.
(Submitting Patches, Packaging Guidelines): New sections.
* doc/guix.texi (Contributing): New section.
Diffstat (limited to 'HACKING')
-rw-r--r-- | HACKING | 80 |
1 files changed, 48 insertions, 32 deletions
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Copyright © 2012, 2013 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> Command-line tools can be used even if you have not run "make install". To do that, prefix each command with ‘./pre-inst-env’, as in: - ./pre-inst-env guix-build --help + ./pre-inst-env guix build --help Similarly, for a Guile session using the Guix modules: @@ -40,6 +40,16 @@ addition to that, you must not miss [[http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ParEdit][Pa directly operate on the syntax tree, such as raising an s-expression or wrapping it, swallowing or rejecting the following s-expression, etc. +* Packaging Guidelines + +The GNU distribution is about respecting the freedom of users. Consequently, +it contains only free software as defined at +http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html . + +In addition, we follow the [[http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html][free software distribution guidelines]]. Among other +things, this means that the distribution tries hard not to steer users towards +obtaining information about non-free software. + * Adding new packages Package recipes in Guix look like this: @@ -68,22 +78,55 @@ Package recipes in Guix look like this: #+END_SRC Such a recipe can be written by hand, and then tested by running -‘./pre-inst-env guix-build nettle’. +‘./pre-inst-env guix build nettle’. When writing the recipe, the base32-encoded SHA256 hash of the source code tarball, which can be seen in the example above, can be obtained by running: - guix-download http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/nettle/nettle-2.5.tar.gz + guix download http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/nettle/nettle-2.5.tar.gz Alternatively, it is possible to semi-automatically import recipes from the [[http://nixos.org/nixpkgs/][Nixpkgs]] software distribution using this command: - guix-import /path/to/nixpkgs/checkout nettle + guix import /path/to/nixpkgs/checkout nettle The command automatically fetches and converts to Guix the “Nix expression” of Nettle. +* Submitting Patches + +Development is done using the Git distributed version control system. Thus, +access to the repository is not strictly necessary. We welcome contributions +in the form of patches as produced by ‘git format-patch’ sent to +bug-guix@gnu.org. Please write commit logs in the [[http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Change-Logs.html#Change-Logs][GNU ChangeLog format]]. + +As you become a regular contributor, you may find it convenient to have write +access to the repository (see below.) + +* Commit Access + +For frequent contributors, having write access to the repository is +convenient. When you deem it necessary, feel free to ask for it on the +mailing list. When you get commit access, please make sure to follow the +policy below (discussions of the policy can take place on bug-guix@gnu.org.) + +Non-trivial patches should always be posted to bug-guix@gnu.org (trivial +patches include fixing typos, etc.) + +For patches that just add a new package, and a simple one, it’s OK to commit, +if you’re confident (which means you successfully built it in a chroot setup.) +Likewise for package upgrades. We have a mailing list for commit +notifications (guix-commits@gnu.org), so people can notice. Before pushing +your changes, make sure to run ‘git pull --rebase’. + +For anything else, please post to bug-guix@gnu.org and leave time for a +review, without committing anything. If you didn’t receive any reply +after two weeks, and if you’re confident, it’s OK to commit. + +That last part is subject to being adjusted, allowing individuals to commit +directly on non-controversial changes on parts they’re familiar with. + * Porting the Guix distro on a new platform ** Introduction @@ -137,7 +180,7 @@ GCC, libc, etc. need to be built. To that end, run the following commands: #+BEGIN_SRC sh - ./pre-inst-env guix-build -K \ + ./pre-inst-env guix build -K \ -e '(@ (gnu packages make-bootstrap) %bootstrap-tarballs)' \ --system=i686-linux @@ -174,30 +217,3 @@ shown above. For example, all the binaries (except for glibc) must be statically-linked; the bootstrap Guile must be relocatable (see patch in the Guix distro); the static-binaries tarball must contain the same programs (Coreutils, Grep, sed, Awk, etc.); and so on. - -* Commit Access - -Development is done using the Git distributed version control system. Thus, -access to the repository is not strictly necessary. We welcome contributions -in the form of patches as produced by ‘git format-patch’ sent to -bug-guix@gnu.org. - -However, for frequent contributors, having write access to the repository is -convenient. When you get commit access, please make sure to follow the policy -below (discussions of the policy can take place on bug-guix@gnu.org.) - -Non-trivial patches should always be posted to bug-guix@gnu.org (trivial -patches include fixing typos, etc.) - -For patches that just add a new package, and a simple one, it’s OK to commit, -if you’re confident (which means you successfully built it in a chroot setup.) -Likewise for package upgrades. We have a mailing list for commit -notifications (guix-commits@gnu.org), so people can notice. Before pushing -your changes, make sure to run ‘git pull --rebase’. - -For anything else, please post to bug-guix@gnu.org and leave time for a -review, without committing anything. If you didn’t receive any reply -after two weeks, and if you’re confident, it’s OK to commit. - -That last part is subject to being adjusted, allowing individuals to commit -directly on non-controversial changes on parts they’re familiar with. |