aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKatherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com>2019-03-29 15:59:51 -0500
committer宋文武 <iyzsong@member.fsf.org>2019-04-07 14:10:04 +0800
commite7dcdd9feacf3314d040739ceb250d4a26894ee0 (patch)
treeb983254ac76c6e392ca42229619c0e186ea048ac
parent135984ef153ea757ab06be34531d49839b6c692f (diff)
downloadpatches-e7dcdd9feacf3314d040739ceb250d4a26894ee0.tar
patches-e7dcdd9feacf3314d040739ceb250d4a26894ee0.tar.gz
gnu: Add checkl.
* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (sbcl-checkl, cl-checkl): New variables. Signed-off-by: 宋文武 <iyzsong@member.fsf.org>
-rw-r--r--gnu/packages/lisp.scm38
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 99eb9cb830..91ee3d3428 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -4616,3 +4616,41 @@ Only minimal changes required to make your CLOS objects serializable.")
(define-public cl-marshal
(sbcl-package->cl-source-package sbcl-marshal))
+
+(define-public sbcl-checkl
+ (let ((commit "80328800d047fef9b6e32dfe6bdc98396aee3cc9")
+ (revision "1"))
+ (package
+ (name "sbcl-checkl")
+ (version (git-version "0.0.0" revision commit))
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://github.com/rpav/CheckL.git")
+ (commit commit)))
+ (file-name (git-file-name name version))
+ (sha256
+ (base32 "0bpisihx1gay44xmyr1dmhlwh00j0zzi04rp9fy35i95l2r4xdlx"))))
+ (build-system asdf-build-system/sbcl)
+ (arguments
+ ;; Error while trying to load definition for system checkl-test from
+ ;; pathname [...]/checkl-test.asd: The function CHECKL:DEFINE-TEST-OP
+ ;; is undefined.
+ '(#:tests? #f))
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("sbcl-fiveam" ,sbcl-fiveam)))
+ (inputs
+ `(("sbcl-marshal" ,sbcl-marshal)))
+ (home-page "https://github.com/rpav/CheckL/")
+ (synopsis "Dynamic testing for Common Lisp")
+ (description
+ "CheckL lets you write tests dynamically, it checks resulting values
+against the last run.")
+ ;; The author specifies both LLGPL and "BSD", but the "BSD" license
+ ;; isn't specified anywhere, so I don't know which kind. LLGPL is the
+ ;; stronger of the two and so I think only listing this should suffice.
+ (license license:llgpl))))
+
+(define-public cl-checkl
+ (sbcl-package->cl-source-package sbcl-checkl))