diff options
| author | Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> | 2019-08-27 19:36:05 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> | 2019-08-27 19:36:05 +0900 |
| commit | 4183105de08a2403915536a97d06ca0c119487bc (patch) | |
| tree | 27298d0365c9e6decdc981f1d1e93ea43822fe21 | |
| parent | d8f08344a7d6060fca73c12fe27a0d1a3528acda (diff) | |
| download | patches-4183105de08a2403915536a97d06ca0c119487bc.tar patches-4183105de08a2403915536a97d06ca0c119487bc.tar.gz | |
doc: Follow-up commit to 407ebeaa1.
Following some discussion with Ludovic (see:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2019-08/msg00506.html), it is
better advice to generally recommend the use of `program-file' for any usage
of modules, not just for those which define syntax.
* doc/guix.texi (Scheduled Job Execution): Drop the following text: "that
defines syntax (macros)".
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/guix.texi | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index c1e451fbec..6499b39ebf 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -12443,10 +12443,10 @@ gexps to introduce job definitions that are passed to mcron @end lisp For more complex jobs defined in Scheme where you need control over the top -level, for instance to introduce a @code{use-modules} form that defines syntax -(macros), you can move your code to a separate program using the -@code{program-file} procedure of the @code{(guix gexp)} module -(@pxref{G-Expressions}). The example below illustrates that. +level, for instance to introduce a @code{use-modules} form, you can move your +code to a separate program using the @code{program-file} procedure of the +@code{(guix gexp)} module (@pxref{G-Expressions}). The example below +illustrates that. @lisp (define %battery-alert-job |