channels: Do not fail when the inferior lacks 'guix repl'.

Fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/34637>.
Reported by Martin Flack <martin.flack@gmail.com>.

Previously we'd fail to build the package cache for old versions of Guix
that lack 'guix repl'.  Now we simply ignore the issue and keep going
without a cache.

* guix/inferior.scm (gexp->derivation-in-inferior): Add
 #:silent-failure? and honor it.
[drop-extra-keyword]: New procedure.
Use it.
* guix/channels.scm (package-cache-file): Pass #:silent-failure? #t.

2 files changed, 29 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/guix/channels.scm b/guix/channels.scm
index 96d62ce062..9658cf9393 100644
--- a/guix/channels.scm
+++ b/guix/channels.scm
@@ -477,6 +477,12 @@ be used as a profile hook."
 
     (gexp->derivation-in-inferior "guix-package-cache" build
                                   profile
+
+                                  ;; If the Guix in PROFILE is too old and
+                                  ;; lacks 'guix repl', don't build the cache
+                                  ;; instead of failing.
+                                  #:silent-failure? #t
+
                                   #:properties '((type . profile-hook)
                                                  (hook . package-cache))
                                   #:local-build? #t)))
diff --git a/guix/inferior.scm b/guix/inferior.scm
index 027418a98d..63c95141d7 100644
--- a/guix/inferior.scm
+++ b/guix/inferior.scm
@@ -513,10 +513,15 @@ PACKAGE must be live."
   (inferior-package->derivation package system #:target target))
 
 (define* (gexp->derivation-in-inferior name exp guix
+                                       #:key silent-failure?
+                                       #:allow-other-keys
                                        #:rest rest)
   "Return a derivation that evaluates EXP with GUIX, an instance of Guix as
 returned for example by 'channel-instances->derivation'.  Other arguments are
-passed as-is to 'gexp->derivation'."
+passed as-is to 'gexp->derivation'.
+
+When SILENT-FAILURE? is true, create an empty output directory instead of
+failing when GUIX is too old and lacks the 'guix repl' command."
   (define script
     ;; EXP wrapped with a proper (set! %load-path …) prologue.
     (scheme-file "inferior-script.scm" exp))
@@ -539,9 +544,23 @@ passed as-is to 'gexp->derivation'."
           (write `(primitive-load #$script) pipe)
 
           (unless (zero? (close-pipe pipe))
-            (error "inferior failed" #+guix)))))
-
-  (apply gexp->derivation name trampoline rest))
+            (if #$silent-failure?
+                (mkdir #$output)
+                (error "inferior failed" #+guix))))))
+
+  (define (drop-extra-keyword lst)
+    (let loop ((lst lst)
+               (result '()))
+      (match lst
+        (()
+         (reverse result))
+        ((#:silent-failure? _ . rest)
+         (loop rest result))
+        ((kw value . tail)
+         (loop tail (cons* value kw result))))))
+
+  (apply gexp->derivation name trampoline
+         (drop-extra-keyword rest)))
 
 
 ;;;