aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/contrib/authority-policy.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/contrib/authority-policy.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/contrib/authority-policy.txt89
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 89 deletions
diff --git a/doc/contrib/authority-policy.txt b/doc/contrib/authority-policy.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index dd3dc1178..000000000
--- a/doc/contrib/authority-policy.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
-
-0. Overview.
-
- This document contains various informal policies for how to operate
- a directory authority, how to choose new ones, etc.
-
-1. How to pick a new directory authority.
-
- Here's our current guidelines for how to pick new directory
- authorities.
-
- (These won't ever be formal criteria -- we need to keep this flexible
- so we can adapt to new situations.)
-
- o Stability:
- - Must be a low-downtime Tor server (computer as well as network).
- - Must have a static IP.
- - The operator must have been running a stable Tor server for at least
- 3 months.
- - Must intend for this server to stick around for the next 12 months
- or more.
- - Must not hibernate.
- - Should not be an exit node (as this increases the risk both of
- downtime and of key compromise).
-
- o Performance:
- - Must have sufficient bandwidth: at least 300 kB/s symmetric,
- though in practice the inbound traffic can be considerably less.
-
- o Availability:
- - Must be available to upgrade within a few days in most cases.
- (While we're still developing Tor, we periodically find bugs that
- impact the whole network and require authority upgrades.)
- - Should have a well-known way to contact the administrator
- via PGP-encrypted message.
-
- o Integrity:
- - Must promise not to censor or attack the network and users.
- - Should be run by somebody that Tor (i.e. Roger) knows.
- - Should be widely regarded as fair/trustworthy, or at least
- known, by many people.
- - If somebody asks you to backdoor or change your server, legally or
- otherwise, you will fight it to the extent of your abilities. If
- you fail to fight it, you must shut down the Tor server and notify
- us that you have.
-
- o Diversity
- - We should avoid situations that make it likelier for multiple
- authority failures to happen at the same time. Therefore...
- - It's good when authorities are not all in the same country.
- - It's good when authorities are not all in the same jurisdictions.
- - It's good when authorities are not all running the same OS.
- - It's good when authorities are not all using the same ISP.
- - It's good when authorities are not all running the same
- version of Tor.
- - No two authorities should have the same operator.
- - Maximal diversity, however, is not always practical. Sometimes,
- for example, there is only one version of Tor that provides a
- given consensus generation algorithm.
- - A small group of authorities with the same country/jurisdiction/OS is
- not a problem, until that group's size approaches quorum (half the
- authorities).
-
-2. How to choose the recommended versions
-
- The policy, in a nutshell, is to not remove versions without a good
- reason. So this means we should recommend all versions except:
-
- - Versions that no longer conform to the spec. That is, if they wouldn't
- actually interact correctly with the current Tor network.
- - Versions that have known security problems.
- - Versions that have frequent crash or assert problems.
- - Versions that harm the performance or stability of the current Tor
- network or the anonymity of other users. For example, a version
- that load balances wrong, or a version that hammers the authorities
- too much.
-
-
-> some use the slight variant of requiring a *good* reason.
-> excellent reasons include "there's a security flaw"
-> good reasons include "that crashes every time you start it. you would think
-+tor is dumb if you tried to use that version and think of it as tor."
-> good reasons include "those old clients do their load balancing wrong, and
-+they're screwing up the whole network"
-> reasons include "the old one is really slow, clients should prefer the new
-+one"
-> i try to draw the line at 'good reasons and above'
-
-